Google search engine
Home Destinations US Halts All Immigrant Visa Applications Globally Under New Screening Policy

US Halts All Immigrant Visa Applications Globally Under New Screening Policy

US halts immigrant visa applications due to new screening policy
Image: US Universities Expo 2014 by US Embassy New Zealand via flickr, pdm

The Trump administration halted all immigrant visa applications worldwide starting in early August 2026 to implement a new screening policy targeting immigrants likely to become public charges, the U.S. State Department confirmed. This global pause affects all immigrant visa appointments as consular staff are briefed on updated public charge rules designed to exclude applicants projected to depend on government benefits.

Scope and Schedule of Immigrant Visa Pause

The pause affects primarily family-based immigrant visas, including those for parents, spouses, children, and siblings of U.S. citizens. Employment-based immigrant visas remain unaffected due to applicants’ demonstrated earnings. While interviews scheduled for August 2026 were not cancelled, they are being

rescheduled to September, October, and November 2026. Experts note rescheduling poses challenges because immigrant visa appointments are limited and difficult to obtain. The pause is expected to end by early to mid-September 2026.

Background: Visa Ban Overturned and Public Charge Rule Reinforcement

The suspension follows the mid-August 2026 ruling by U.S. District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas that overturned a 75-country immigrant visa ban imposed since January 2026. The ban had denied visas solely based on nationality. Concurrently, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, part of the Department of Homeland Security, reinstated stricter public charge rules that consider use of food stamps, Medicaid, and housing vouchers in green card eligibility determinations.

The visa pause allows consular officers to be trained on these changes.

Mass Revocation of Business and Tourist Visas Planned

Separately, the Trump administration plans to revoke up to 200,000 B-1 and B-2 business and tourist visas issued from 2016 to 2026 for individuals who have applied or applied for asylum. This would represent the largest mass visa revocation in U.S. history and is expected to encounter legal challenges. The revocation does not affect applicants already in the United States with pending asylum claims. The policy aims to enforce immigration laws by discouraging use of tourist visas as a means to seek asylum.

Official and Expert Perspectives on Immigration Policy and Enforcement

Julia Gelatt, associate director of

the U.S. immigration policy program at the Migration Policy Institute, characterized the administration’s approach as aiming to reduce immigration by tightening entry criteria. She said, “The thing linking them is a general philosophy that immigration is bad for the United States and that the Trump administration is looking for all of the ways it can to button down our immigration system to allow in fewer people.” Gelatt added the pause is likely short but cautioned that a longer delay could trigger litigation.

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau stated, “People in the U.S. and all over the world are fed

up with bogus asylum claims. Asylum isn’t supposed to be a loophole to circumvent immigration laws.” Since April 2026, consulates were instructed to deny visas to applicants indicating fear of returning to their home countries.

Impact on Immigrant Visa Applicants and Asylum Seekers

Applicants with immigrant visa interviews during August 2026 face rescheduling delays into later months, complicating travel and immigration planning due to limited appointment availability. Family-based immigrant visa applicants outside the United States are mainly impacted by the pause. Those holding tourist or business visas revoked due to asylum claims will not have their asylum process affected if their claims are already pending. Asylum adjudications can

take years, whereas tourist and business visas allow stays of about six months.

Gelatt noted, “The goal is instead to send a message that this administration is focused on enforcement and that people who want to live in the United States should not think about coming on a tourist visa and then seeking asylum.” She described the visa revocation as symbolic for enforcement intent rather than disrupting existing asylum processes.